Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pplz are they any good im hoping to run 20psi with a high modded car

should i get one or get something else

please let me know

I like 'em

Easy to install

Stable boost

Simple to adjust via Commander

Adjust and log via Datalogit

No ricey blue screen

:O cheers :(

I like mine.

But, if you can handle the ricey screen (I would mount it invisibly under the dash or in the glovebox) I would have bought the AVC-R insted of the Boost kit.

Reason? I'd just like to be able to adjust the boost in first gear.

I know everyone, myself included, normally says "Adjust boost with right foot" but I can now see the merit of having adjustable boost according to speed.

Would be great, especially during drag racing testing, to be able to add 0.5 psi at a time to first gear to try to eliminate wheelspin.

my $0.22 cents

pplz are they any good im hoping to run 20psi with a high modded car

should i get one or get something else

please let me know

Hmm - let me be the first to set a cat amongst the pigeons

I don't like mine

I have a mildly modified R32 GTR (~300awkw) with PFC + EBC and in hind sight I wish I had spent the extra ca$h up front and gone for the TurboSmart eBoost

It ?may? be just my tune - but I find mine does NOT hold even boost once I hit the max boost setting. The boost line waves all over the place – IE it varies +/- 1psi across the rev range.

Again – I don't know if this is the EBC or not – but that's what I get :)

I've seen other dyno graphs that are as flat as a tack once they hit the max boost setting

I also find it VERY noisy, it rattles/chatters like the clappers. That ?may? also be due to the fact that mine is mounted high on the passenger side fire wall – which makes it very easy to hear from inside the cabin.

If nothing else – this will give you something to think about

that's my 2c worth :mellow:

(let the flames begin)

Hmm - let me be the first to set a cat amongst the pigeons

It ?may? be just my tune - but I find mine does NOT hold even boost once I hit the max boost setting. The boost line waves all over the place – IE it varies +/- 1psi across the rev range.

Again – I don't know if this is the EBC or not – but that's what I get :D

I also find it VERY noisy, it rattles/chatters like the clappers. That ?may? also be due to the fact that mine is mounted high on the passenger side fire wall – which makes it very easy to hear from inside the cabin.

To get stable boost you need to have reasonably short hoses to the actuator.

If your's is on the firewall its probably too far away.

If it is installed closer to the turbo(s) ie, the passenger side strut tower, it should control boost better.

(and be quieter)

Although I know nothing, I have spoken to a tuner who doesn't like th PFC add-on, he prefers the AVCR. His reasons were, (AVCR has ) stabler boost, easier to setup and tune, with option of ironing out spikes at specific rpm, more functions. Though it might have been worth a mention.

Great unit, its the same unit really, i was missing the PFC sensor kit so i bought the AVCR one as its the same. Basically its the same without the rice blue screen.

And mine keeps boost very well.

so - any other suggestions as to why my unit does not hold a steady boost ?

If you have a nice stable consistant wastegate then their good but if not use an EBC with its own MAP sensor.

The Boost Control Kit comes with a MAP sensor, the same MAP sensor as the AVCR.

The Boost Control Kit solenoid is the same solenoid as the AVCR.

I have spoken to a tuner who doesn't like th PFC add-on, he prefers the AVCR. His reasons were, (AVCR has ) stabler boost, easier to setup and tune, with option of ironing out spikes at specific rpm, more functions.

That would be a lazy tuner. I would say the tune on the engine is substandard or it has other issues causing the boost to fluctuate. Instead of fixing the real problem, he prefers to stick a band aid on it. Use the boost controller to cover up for other issues that really should be fixed.

Technically speaking, boost is load dependant, not RPM dependant, so making boost corrections based on rpm points is not correct. It might smooth out the boost curve on the dyno, where the load and gearing is exactly the same every time. In the real world, that is simply not the case, where boost is very much gearing and load dependant. For example, you could be applying a boost correction at 6,000 rpm in fourth gear that is simple wrong at 6,000 rpm in second gear.

Next time someone tells you that rpm boost correction is a good thing to have, ask them to explain how they get around the effect on boost of differing loads at the same rpm.

:D cheers :D

I am also curious. Would it be better to spend the $$ on the kit or buy say a Blitz Dual SBC Spec R which I have not found onje bad review for.

The Spec R is dual solenoid and everyone says that its the best controller out there.

I have read mixed reports about the AVCR and its reliability. This would then flow on to the boost kit since they use the same components.

How much boost are you running?

What turbo?

What is the wastegate spring pressure?

Maybe you are trying to bleed off a bunch of air. Could be remedied by a bigger wastegate spring....

R32 GTR with freash forged motor and R34 N1s - running (only) 1.2bar (18 psi). Using the std N1 actuators (waste gate spring ?)

The Boost Control Kit comes with a MAP sensor, the same MAP sensor as the AVCR.

The Boost Control Kit solenoid is the same solenoid as the AVCR.

That would be a lazy tuner. I would say the tune on the engine is substandard or it has other issues causing the boost to fluctuate. Instead of fixing the real problem, he prefers to stick a band aid on it. Use the boost controller to cover up for other issues that really should be fixed.

Technically speaking, boost is load dependant, not RPM dependant, so making boost corrections based on rpm points is not correct. It might smooth out the boost curve on the dyno, where the load and gearing is exactly the same every time. In the real world, that is simply not the case, where boost is very much gearing and load dependant. For example, you could be applying a boost correction at 6,000 rpm in fourth gear that is simple wrong at 6,000 rpm in second gear.

Next time someone tells you that rpm boost correction is a good thing to have, ask them to explain how they get around the effect on boost of differing loads at the same rpm.

:D cheers :D

i always doubted the avcr "gear boost" functionality, thanks for clearing up

I like mine.

But, if you can handle the ricey screen (I would mount it invisibly under the dash or in the glovebox) I would have bought the AVC-R insted of the Boost kit.

Reason? I'd just like to be able to adjust the boost in first gear.

I know everyone, myself included, normally says "Adjust boost with right foot" but I can now see the merit of having adjustable boost according to speed.

Would be great, especially during drag racing testing, to be able to add 0.5 psi at a time to first gear to try to eliminate wheelspin.

my $0.22 cents

Get some street R series tyres and then you wont have to worry about hi boost in lower gears.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...